( XVIII )
you have stolen the money of Allah!' So I said: 'I am not the enemy of Allah, nor am I the enemy of His Book. Rather I am the enemy of your enemies. I have not stolen the money of Allah.' He ('Umar) said: 'From where have you brought this ten thousand dirhams?' So I (i.e., Abu Hurayra) said: 'Some horses reproduced, gifts came one by one, and shares came regularly.'" He (i.e., Abu Hurayra) said: "So he ('Umar) took it (the ten thousand dirhams) from me." 'Umar treated his governors as he treated Khalid b. al-Walid and Abu Hurayra. Those who have studied 'Umar's policy know his treatment towards his governors. For example, he dismissed Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, Quddama b. Maz'un, al-Harith b. Wahab, and one of the sons of Layth b. Bakr [1] after he had divided the money among them. This was the policy of 'Umar towards his governors. In other words he treated them severely. However, Mu'awiya was his close companion though he was opposed to his policy. 'Umar did not prevent Mu'awiya from doing anything, nor did he punish him for doing ugly deeds. Rather he said to him: "I do not order you, nor do I prevent you." Besides he let him do according to his viewpoint. This treatment of 'Umar made Mu'awiya a tyrant and encouraged
him to carry out his Umayyad plans. So al-Hasan and al-Husayn
were in danger because of Mu'awiya's cunning. Islam was also in
danger because he spared no effort to destroy it in the name of Islam
and to put out the light of the truth with the name of the truth.
Accordingly, to remove Mu'awiya's danger, al-Hasan and al-Husayn
were before two choices: either to resist Mu'awiya or to surrender to
him. As for the resistance under the leadership of al-Hasan, they
thought that it would certainly destroy those who protected the
religion and its followers. Also it would destroy those who guided
people to Allah, the Great and Almighty, and to His straight path. On
the other hand, his brother al-Husayn sacrificed his life at the Battle of
[1] Al-Zubayr b. Bakkar, al-Muwaffaqiyat. Concerning the biography of al Harith b. Wahab, b. Hajar has reported the above- mentioned words in his book 'al-Isaba,' Chapter One, on the authority of al-Zubayr b. Bakkar.
|
( XIX )
Karbala'. He gathered the Hashimites and their followers. He waged war against the strong Umayyads. If al-Hasan had sacrificed his life in this manner, the battle would have resulted in killing them all. [1] Namely the Umayyads would have gained a victory over them and achieved their hopes and desires. If al-Hasan and his followers had been killed, the Umayyads would be the only rulers over the Muslim community. So al-Hasan, far be it from him, would fall into what he escaped from in the worst manner. Also his sacrifice would have no effect on the public opinion except blame and refute. [2] From here al-Hasan, peace be on him, decided to leave Mu'awiya play with his tyranny and to test him with authority. However, al Hasan obligated Mu'awiya to conform to the Qur'an and the Sunna (the Prophet's words and acts). Also he obligated him not to punish the Shi'a for a certain mistake they had done towards the Umayyads, to respect them, and to give them their rights fully like the other Muslims. Besides al-Hasan obligated Mu'awiya to carry out other conditions though he knew that the latter would not fulfill his promise or would do the opposite. [3]
[1] As Shaykh Radi Al-Yasin has explained in this book.
[2] That is because Mu'awiya insisted on making a peace- treaty with al Hasan. He declared that he was ready to carry out all conditions of al-Hasan for Allah and the community. He besought him to prevent the bloodshed of the community of his grandfather. He (Mu'awiya) declared his request, so the two parties knew it. If the battle had lasted, Mu'awiya would have defeated al-Hasan. Al-Hasan, Mu'awiya, and their soldiers knew the result of the battle. So if al-Hasan had insisted on fighting Mu'awiya he would have been defeated and blamed.
Moreover, if al-Hasan had said that Mu'awiya would not fulfill his conditions, the common people would have not believed him because they admired Mu'awiya, as we have already mentioned, and because the defects of the Umayyads were not clear for them to support al-Hasan and to abandon Mu'awiya. However, the defects of the Umayyads during the lifetime of the Lord of martyrs (i.e., al-Husayn) were so clear that his sacrifice played an important role in supporting the truth and its followers, praise be to Allah.
Read the chapter: "the Secret of the Attitude" in this book.
[3] Read the Peace Treaty in this book.
|