162 
The contents of the former verses show that, in order to shirk believing in
Resurrection and its responsibilities, the rejecters of Resurrection expressed
their objections in three ways:
1- To return to life after becoming dust is improbable, because, as they
believed, dust could not be the source of life.
2- This kind of belief belongs to the ancient, and it is not a new thing.
3- The lack of the descent of punishment for the rejecters of Resurrection,
because, they said, if the rejecters must really be punished in this world, why
does not this punishment seize them?
For the answer of the first and the second instances, the Qur’ān has left it
to their clearness, because we always see by our eyes that dust becomes the
source of life. At first, we were dust and then we came into being as a living
creature.
The state of a thing being old or belonging to the ancient does not decrease
its importance, because the main laws of this world, from pre-eternity to future
eternity, are wholly fix and unchangeable. The fix principles in philosophical
principles, mathematic problems, and other sciences are abundant. Is the
Pythagoras’ multiplication table invalid because it is old, or is its being
ancient as a reason for its weakness? Or if we see that justice is good and
injustice is bad, and it is so and it will be so forever, is it a reason for its
falseness? In principle, many times, the perpetuity of something proves its
authenticity.
Concerning their third objection, the Qur’ān answers that they should not
hasten for meeting chastisement. It is the grace of Allah that He gives them
respite and does not punish them promptly, but they must be careful that
chastisement will come though it comes late.
* * * *
|