255 
the Children of Israel and refused to commit no crime against the Children of
Israel. Thus they were not some oneswhose bloodcould behonourable speciallyfor
the Children of Israel.
The thingsthat havecreated difficulty for the commentators are the
expressions that Moses (a.s.) himself has stated in this event:
Once he says: “… This is of the Satan’s doing, …”[1]
In another occurrence he says: “My Lord! Verily I have done harm to myself!
Do you then forgive me!’ …”[2]
How do these expressions agree with the infallibility of the prophets who
must have the rank of immunity even before their prophethood and Messengership?
But the above explanations upon the commentary of the above verses make clear
that what Moses did was not more than leaving the better (nodbī). By this act he
troubled him because a Coptic being killed by Moses was not an ordinary thing
that the people of Pharaoh could easily renounce, and we know that abandoning
this action is in the sense of an action which is not essentially unlawful
(harām), but it causes that a better deed may be left without that a wrong
action would have been done.
Something similar to this meaning has also been cited in the life story of
some other prophets, including Hadrat Adam, the explanation of which was given
when commenting on Sura Al-’A‘rāf, No. 7, verse 19.
A tradition upon the commentary of this verse has been recorded in
‘Uyūn-ul-’Akhbar from Imam Ali-ibn-Mūsar-Ridā (a.s.) whosaid: “The purpose of
the Qur’ānic sentence: “… this is of the Satan’s doing; …” is the conflict of
those two with
[1] Sura under discussion, verse 15
[2] The verse under discussion
|